MATROCLINIC INHERITANCE IN MUTATION CROSSES OF OENOTHERA REYNOLDSII

A Case of Mendelian Inheritance Complicated by Heterogametism and Mutation in OENOTHERA PRATINCOLA.

INT~ODUCTION ................................................................... Hypothesis of heterogametism ..................................................... Equivalence, within strain C, of pollen of Oenothera pratincola f. typica and mut. latifolia. . The Fa and F, generations of the cross mut. formosa from strain E X mut. latifolia from strainc ............................................

Epistatic control of non-Mendelian inheritance in mouse interspecific crosses.

Strong deviation of allele frequencies from Mendelian inheritance favoring Mus spretus-derived alleles has been described previously for X-linked loci in four mouse interspecific crosses. We reanalyzed data for three of these crosses focusing on the location of the gene(s) controlling deviation on the X chromosome and the genetic basis for incomplete deviation. At least two loci control deviati...

The Segregation of OENOTHERA NANELLA-BREVISTYLIS from Crosses with NANELLA and with LAMARCKIANA.

PAGE INTRODUCTION. ... ............................................................. 57 The F1 generation of nanellaXnanella-brevistylis. .................................... 59 The F1 generations from nanellaXnanella-brevistylis. ................................. 59 The F1 generation of LamarckianaXnanella-brevistylis. ............................... 60 The F1 generation from LamarckianaXnanel...

A Criticism of the Evidence for the Mutation Theory of De Vries from the Behavior of Species of Oenothera in Crosses and in Selfed Lines.

The Inheritance of Certain Characters in Oenothera Hybrids of Different Chromosome Configurations.

Crosses between “franciscana sulfurea” and sulfur-dwarf . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327 Crosses between ‘ffranciscana sulfurea” and Oenothera franciscana ...................... 328 Chromosome configurations of the hybrids. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 332 Interpretation of data.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....